The Story Behind The “Random House Gives $5,000 Bonuses” Story

Hal Holbrook as Deep Throat “Forget the myths…follow the money.”

[Happy New Year!  Here’s an oldie but goodie about how profitable a BIG BOOK SERIES can be and why resisting the impulse to sell yours to a big publisher after it’s a success makes sense…]

For those of us who came of age in the analog universe, the phrase “follow the money” reminds us of a movie that inspired thousands of people to get graduate degrees in Journalism. It comes from William Goldman’s brilliant screenplay adaptation of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s seminal narrative nonfiction book All the President’s Men, which was published by the venerable Simon & Schuster in 1974.

In Alan J. Pakula’s movie, Woodward’s primary source Deep Throat (revealed a few years ago as the FBI’s number two man at the time W. Mark Felt), only agrees to confirm or deny Woodward and Bernstein’s reporting. He won’t hand them the Watergate story on a silver plate. But W&B get stuck. Seeing Woodward’s (played by Robert Redford) desperation, Deep Throat (played by Hal Holbrook) agrees to give Woodward one piece of advice.

He tells Woodward to “forget the myths the media has created . . . follow the money.”

The quote is not in the book. Consummate storyteller William Goldman coined that “follow the money” phrase, not Woodward and Bernstein. As a seasoned Hollywood screenwriter, Goldman knew that putting aside mythology and following the money in his business is always revelatory. By extension, he used money as the through line device for his screenplay about Washington. Can anyone argue today that money is not the operating factor in politics? Back then it wasn’t so obvious.

I’m sure you’ve read the press coverage about Random House Inc. giving each of its 5,343 employees a $5,000 bonus this year.  I checked this morning on Google News and over 1,100 stories have been written about their $27,000,000’s worth of good cheer.

How did they afford to do that?

I worked at divisions of Random House (Dell Publishing and Doubleday) and I can tell you that bonuses in my day were often of the “No Christmas party this year but Congratulations . . . you get to keep your job next year!” variety.

Random House was able to pass on some cash to its employees because of the jaw dropping success of the Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy. You already know this story. An online Australian outfit called The Writers Coffee Shop (a long tail eBook and Print on Demand publisher like Black Irish Books) published all three of E.L. James’ erotic novels in 2011. The eBook versions of the books were $9.99 U.S., but the trade paperback editions were a whopping $29.99.

Just so you know, TWCS wasn’t gouging on the paperback price. Print on Demand publishing is just that . . . one copy at a time, which is not exactly efficient for a big sensational hit.  And as the Grey books are all over 500 pages in length, the price per unit POD costs must have been quite high (my estimate would be about $8.00).

As a $29.99 price point yields $15.00 (50%) to the publisher after the retailers take their share, the production costs exceeded the per unit revenue ($8 versus $7). Not so good. While a $7 per unit revenue is nothing to sniff at, maintaining any kind of large inventory for a retailer is a nightmare for a POD book. So the big margin per unit doesn’t pay off all that much for the publisher.

The truth is that there was a lot of demand for the paperback even at that high price point, but the copies just weren’t out there for people to buy. It was a very large lost opportunity.

But the good news was that the word of mouth on the books was sensational and by the spring of 2012, the three books had sold over 250,000 eBooks.  The paperback versions however were just dribbing and drabbing along . . . about 7,000 sold per title. It was obvious that something had to be done.

So when the largest English Language publishers in the world came calling in March 2012, Ms. James (a pseudonym for a former British television producer named Erika Leonard) and her agent Valerie Hoskins decided to hear them out.  If a big publisher were to take over the production of the paperbacks, the price would surely fall, the availability of the books would be radically improved and thus more people would be able to afford and find them.

The Executive Vice President and Publisher Anne Messitte at Vintage, a paperback division of Random House, made the most compelling argument. So Ms. James decided to sign over the paperback publishing rights to her works to Vintage for that magical phrase…the seven figure advance.

But there was catch. In order to cash the $1,000,000 check, Ms. James would have to sign over not just the paperback rights, but all rights, including eBook rights.

Let me assure you that Vintage did not pull a fast one here. It was not the only publisher interested in the books and I can safely say (although I was in no way privy to any of these negotiations) that every single big six publisher that Ms. James met insisted that she turn over eBook rights—including Random House’s rival Simon & Schuster.

No eBook rights, no deal.  It was a line in the sand that none of the Big Six were willing to cross in March 2012 . . . Just 8 and a half months ago. If E.L. James wanted a big six publisher to publish her books, she had to give them her eBooks too.

A case study of the numbers involved with the Fifty Shades trilogy, though, reveals just how expensive it was for Ms. James to agree to these terms. I wonder how many more bestselling self-published writers will be willing to play by them in the future . . . I can guarantee far fewer after other news that was practically ignored by big media from this past Wednesday . . . more on that below.

Here is the math for the Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy.

Estimated total units sold in 2012 (from numerous reports): 35,000,000.

I’m going to assume that 50% of those units were sold as eBooks.  My gut is that the percentage of eBooks sold is far higher than that. Early in the heated selling climate just after RH/Vintage took over, reported that the trilogy eBooks were selling at a rate six times as much as the paperbacks.  But to be conservative, for the sake of argument let’s just say 17,500,000 eBooks were sold and 17,500,000 physical copies were sold.

How much money did they make for Random House/Vintage versus E.L. James?

Let’s begin by looking at the traditional paperback numbers.

The books sell for $15.95 a unit in paperback.  The publisher, Random House/Vintage, sells the books wholesale for 50% off the retail cover price to retailers who in turn sell to consumers.  So each book sold brings in approx. $8.00 a unit to Random House/Vintage.

So the total amount of revenue generated by 17,500,000 paperback sold is $140,000,000 (17,500,000 x $8.00).

Now Random House/Vintage had to manufacture, warehouse and ship at least 17,500,000 paperbacks to generate that 140 million of revenue.  Let’s say they’ve produced 20,000,000 to account for returns etc. And let’s say it cost Random House/Vintage $2.00 per unit to produce, warehouse and ship them.  Their economies of scale probably brought that unit cost way down…under $1.50 I’d assume, but let’s keep $2.00 as our number, again just to be conservative.

The paperback revenue ($140,000,000) minus the $40,000,000 in production, warehousing and shipping costs (20,000,000 copies x $2.00) leaves $100,000,000 of net revenue to Random House.

But Random House/Vintage has to pay the author too.  They don’t get to keep all of that pot for themselves.

Now traditional trade paperback royalties are 7.5% of the retail cover price for every copy sold, which would equate to $1.20 per unit copy sold (7.5% of $15.95) taken out of the big pot.

Some big cheeses (big bestselling writers with long track records of success) get royalty escalations after 100,000 units sold…up to 10% of the retail cover price.  Again, let’s be crazily conservative and say that E.L. James’ and her agent convinced Random House /Vintage to pay a royalty of 10% of the retail cover price straight instead of 7.5%.

10% of $15.95 is, to make the math easier, $1.60.

$1.60 per unit with 17,500,000 sold throws off $28,000,000 in royalties for paperback sales to E.L. James.

So Random House/Vintage’s conservative net profit on just the sale of 17,500,000 paperbacks is:



E.L. James’ share is:


I’d argue that that distribution of income is fair given the fact that Random House/Vintage dealt with an extraordinary number of variables to bring the books to the marketplace.

But that’s not all of the revenue . . . we now have to look at the revenue generated by eBook sales.

The eBooks retail for $9.99, which is the same price as the original The Writers Coffee Shop version that sold 250,000 units.  Random House/Vintage sells the eBook under the agency model and collects 70% of all revenue from the sale of the $9.99 book, or $7.00 a unit.  The remaining 30% goes to the retailer.

So the total amount of revenue generated by 17,500,000 eBook copies sold is (17,500,000 x $7.00) $122,500,000.

But for eBook sales, things are even better for Random House/Vintage.

Here’s why.

After you spend at most $1,000 converting a book into the appropriate file formats (kindle and ePub), there are no production costs to produce and sell an eBook.  You don’ have to print anything. You don’t have to warehouse anything and you don’t have to ship anything.

So Random House/Vintage’s gross $122,500,000 revenue from the sale of 17,500,000 eBooks is only reduced by the amount of money it cost to convert the files to the appropriate format.  Let’s be crazy and say it cost them a half a million dollars to do that for three books that were already in the correct format.  That $500,000 will cover the amount of money they needed to spend to employ for a full year the total number of employees who directly contributed to the digitalization, marketing and publicizing of the book.

Remember the publisher has no production costs…no matter what they tell you.  Their overhead (what it takes for them to employ people and keep the lights on) is not a production cost!

The standard royalty rate for eBook from the big six publishers is (ahem) 25% of net dollars received.  It’s hard not to believe that there is not some sort of gentleman’s agreement among the big six in place about not breaking this barrier. I’m not saying that the six heads got together and shook hands on it.  I’m saying that they didn’t have to.

So E.L. James received 25% of $122,000,000 or $30,500,000 of the eBook revenue pool.

Random House/Vintage on the other hand received $91,500,000 of net revenue for that same sale of eBooks.

So the totals for the 35,000,000 copies sold are:

Random House/Vintage: $163,500,000 net profit

E.L. James: $58,500,000 in royalties

Now, let’s add up what Random House/Vintage brought to the table to earn almost 3 times as much money on the sale of E.L. James’ work than she earned.

A new jacket?  No. Random House/Vintage wisely used the same cover art that made the books number one bestsellers before they took over the franchise.

New publicity? Not really. All of the publicity generated by Fifty Shades was pretty much in the works before RH/Vintage took over. In fact, all subsequent ink is devoted to how successful the books are more than anything else. I doubt that Vintage had to expend more than 100 hours of a single publicist’s time managing this campaign.

Production & Distribution?  Absolutely. This is where Random House did a ton of work.  They earned every penny of the $72,000,000 they made from the sale of the paperback editions.

EBook Distribution? No. All online retailers had the eBooks available before RH took over.  RH/Vintage did not add any value to the eBooks. They merely embedded the Vintage colophon into the digital editions.

Can an argument be made that without Random House/Vintage the trilogy would not have become the sensation that it became?  If there weren’t stacks and stacks of paperbacks at Barnes & Noble, the book would just not have done as well.  I think that’s true.

For fun, let’s say we take away 75% of the volume of sale of the trilogy to offset the loss of Random House/Vintage.  That is, even though Fifty Shades of Grey was a number one New York Times bestseller without the help of Random House/Vintage, it never hit full throttle velocity and sold just a quarter as well. And because the paperback situation never got sorted out, it only sold in eBook.

So instead of 35,000,000 copies sold, it sold 8,750,000. Only in eBook.

In this case E.L. James would receive $61,250,000. Instead of $1.75 a unit (25% of the $7.00 RH/Vintage received from eBook retailers), she’d receive the full 70% of retail cover price eBook revenue or $7.00 a unit times 8,750,000.

Without doing the deal at RH/Vintage, E.L. James would have made $2,625,000 more selling just 25% of the 35,000,000 she sold with Random House/Vintage. And she would have controlled the price point too.

Can’t everyone win?

Can’t a big traditional publisher get a substantial windfall even when a bestselling self-published author takes home the lion’s share of revenue?

Simon & Schuster thinks so.

I guarantee you that after losing out on the Grey sweepstakes last spring, Simon & Schuster followed the Fifty Shades of Grey math. And they figured out, like we just did, that If E.L. James just sold the physical paperback rights to Random House/Vintage and kept the eBook rights for herself, Random House/Vintage would have made $72,000,000 . . .

$72,000,000 represents an entire year’s worth of profit for a Big Six publisher.

$72,000,000 is even enough to cover generous $5,000 bonuses for 5343 employees (approx $27,000,000) with quite a bit of net profit in to the coffers left over too.

How do I know that Simon & Schuster did this math?

Because they just did a deal with agent Kristin Nelson and her client Hugh Howey. Howey wrote and self published books in yet another bestselling series called Wool. Howey hasn’t sold 250,000 eBooks like E.L. James did on her own though.  He’s sold 300,000.

Simon & Schuster ceded eBook rights entirely to Howey and agreed to just publish hardcover and paperback copies.

You’d think that the 1100 online news sources that covered the generous Random House bonus story would be all over this Hugh Howey story right? I just did another Google search for the Hugh Howey deal and got 36 hits. So no . . . few people understand this development for what it really is.

If you are still fitzing and futzing around telling yourself that you’ll start that anonymous blog about the inner working of the United Nations, that artisanal salad dressing business, that high end wood box manufacturing company or putting off outlining your own post apocalyptic trilogy, I recommend you take a good hard look at Hugh Howey’s business.

Wool is not his first novel.  By my count, he wrote and self published seven novels before Wool. Wool was as short story that came to him years after he began his long tail business. He didn’t quit writing when no one cared about his first seven novels (probably more). More impressive, though is that he didn’t sell himself short when they did care either. Being recognized by the big houses was nice, but he wasn’t going to let go of his work just for the third party validation of having a dog on the spine of his books.

He’s a Pro.

I think it’s likely that if he suddenly loses the mojo and Wool tapers off, he’ll still be writing.  He can’t help himself. It’s who he is.

This physical copy only deal is a game changer. It’s nothing short of revolutionary.

Think about it. Simon and Schuster didn’t raise the eBook royalty for Hugh Howey from 25% to 30% of net receipts to lure him to do a deal with them.  They didn’t even go to 50%. They walked away from eBook entirely.


There are any number of reasons why S&S did this deal (not the least of which is that CBS is probably in the middle of negotiations with News Corp. to sell them). But one reason makes the most sense. Someone at Simon & Schuster sees the future (I’m pretty sure I know who).

And the future is in the hands of long tail business creators who have the foresight to take the advice “forget the myths . . . follow the money” as seriously as they do their craft.


Posted in


Steve shows you the predictable Resistance points that every writer hits in a work-in-progress and then shows you how to deal with each one of these sticking points. This book shows you how to keep going with your work.

do the work book banner 1


A short book about the writing of a first novel: for Steve, The Legend of Bagger Vance. Having failed with three earlier attempts at novels, here's how Steve finally succeeded.



Steve shares his "lessons learned" from the trenches of the five different writing careers—advertising, screenwriting, fiction, nonfiction, and self-help. This is tradecraft. An MFA in Writing in 197 pages.



Amateurs have amateur habits. Pros have pro habits. When we turn pro, we give up the comfortable life but we find our power. Steve answers the question, "How do we overcome Resistance?"


A Man At Arms is
on sale now!

Don't miss out on exclusive bonuses available to early buyers!


  1. Basilis on December 14, 2012 at 5:05 am

    I’m just astonished with the information and the analysis!

    Great article, Congrats!

    Once again the “your time will come” theme blended with solid proof!

  2. seth godin on December 14, 2012 at 7:24 am

    Publishing has its forensic accountant.

    Brave, true and insightful, sir.

  3. ChrisCav on December 14, 2012 at 11:46 am

    No higher praise then Mr. G, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^father of Domino and many creative works… but I’ve got to say Shawn, your mastery of your craft both in form and substance is truly a gift and any aspiring or seasoned writer can look to your post as fountain of knowledge and liberation.

    That collective ‘gasp’ you just heard was from every ‘big six’ publisher who now knows that you’ve just pulled the curtain back and provided the blueprint and justification for why the ‘tail’ can and will ‘wag the dog’.

    Great work Shawn. You are a Pro.

  4. Marie on December 14, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    Would it not be wise for Howey to retain the rights to the print books as well and instead have S&S act as the distributors while he serves as his own ‘publisher’? Surely it’s worth a little more negotiation to be able to control how, lets say, fifty percent of his work is sold?

  5. Randall Wood on December 14, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    This is just excellent analysis.

    On other sites/blogs I’m seeing people pester Hugh for details. He politely skates around the subject which shows he has a good grasp of the business. The only question I have is the deal involving the foreign rights to the book. I feel he may have fumbled a little there, but I most likely lack the information to make a worthy opinion.

    Excellent post.

    • J. R. Tomlin (@JRTomlinAuthor) on December 15, 2012 at 12:38 pm

      Excellent and well-researched article which, sad to say, is something of a rarity when it comes to self-publishing.

  6. Jerry Ellis on December 15, 2012 at 3:28 am

    Bravo, Shawn!

  7. Jan Hurst-Nicholson on December 15, 2012 at 6:35 am

    It’s good to read about a writer who did his apprenticeship and kept slogging away until he found success. Hugh Howey was not an ‘overnight’ success, and this bodes well for the rest of us who write because we have to, and who are happy to be midlist writers who can now publish and control our own work. Well done to Hugh – he deserves it.

  8. Bella Andre on December 15, 2012 at 7:18 am

    Yes, the publishing business is definitely shifting. In September I signed a 7 figure deal with harlequin for world English print rights only for my self-pub NYT best selling Sullivan series. I retained all digital, foreign, audio and tv/ film rights. Harlequin is  doing  a major global paperback  launch starting June 2013 in the US, UK, Canada and Australia, so obviously they get the value of the print-only rights . TIME magazine wrote about my deal in last week’s issue and I have sold more than 1.4 million self-pub books.
    ~ Bella Andre

  9. Hugh Howey on December 15, 2012 at 9:25 am

    Great analysis of the 50 Shades of Grey profits. The only thing I’ll say about the rest is that Simon and Schuster deserve a LOT more of the credit than I do. I was just the guy who was presented with the offer. It took them looking at the market and having the corporate flexibility to make one I couldn’t refuse. Kudos to them. I think it’s a continuation of their policy of thinking outside of the box. Look at the John Locke and Tucker Max distribution deals for other examples.

    Some will inevitably paint this as a war between author and publisher, but I continue to see partnerships. In reality (and I think Pressfield’s article touches on this nicely), it’s a case of competition arising among publishers in areas other than size of advance. I truly hope that means good things for readers, writers, and publishers alike. I’ve also worked with Random House Century in the UK, and found them likewise to be thinking outside the box with their marketing and publishing practices. Changes are afoot. Good changes. I’m just a lucky idiot who happens to have a decently selling book at the right time in history. That’s it.

    • Patrice Fitzgerald on December 15, 2012 at 12:54 pm

      Dear Hugh:

      Pardon a moment of gushing here. My husband happened to open (electronically) your WOOL Omnibus this morning, on my recommendation, and he was hooked instantly. Congrats on all your success! You tell a whale of a tale.

      I’m following your career — and your writing.

      We live in Connecticut, and it’s an awful time. Thank goddess for books that take us away, if briefly, from grief.

  10. Katherine Owen on December 15, 2012 at 10:00 am

    This is a great analysis of what’s going on in publishing and how it all interconnects. It IS changing. Steven, thanks for putting it together and sharing your thoughts with all of us. I shared a link to this post on Kindleboards and I see Hugh has weighed in.

    I’m including the link here so you all can track some of the follow-up discussion being posted there as well:,136057.0.html

    Katherine Owen

  11. Scott William Carter on December 15, 2012 at 10:16 am

    I admire your modesty, Hugh, but I do think you’re selling yourself a bit short. Not only did you write a great book (kudos), you did the one thing so many writers seem incapable of doing, especially when there are checks with commas involved: you said NO. Yes, you were doing well anyway, which I’m sure made it easier, but it still took courage and conviction. Ella James could have held out for the same deal too and didn’t.

    Great article, Shawn. The next question is when we start to see these contracts show up at a lower, non-Bestseller level. Then we’ll know the game really has changed.

  12. Jamie Rose on December 15, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    Thank you for this post. Fascinating stuff.

  13. Bob Mayer on December 15, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    The business is changing faster than pretty much anyone can keep up with. The first game changer that was almost completely ignored was Bella Andre’s print only deal with Mira for seven figures earlier this year. After talking with Bella on the phone while she was trying to figure out what to do, I was still surprised when her deal got announced (barely noticed by NY).

    Hugh Howey’s deal is great and I assume Kristen Nelson, his agent, also deserves kudos.

    This deal essentially turns publishing on its ear and the effects will be accelerate things that are already changing.

  14. Jeff Korhan on December 15, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    Shawn – Nothing to add that hasn’t already been said, except this – Thank you!

    Your work is a delight for those of us that can learn from the wisdom of your experience.

  15. Kathy Bennett on December 16, 2012 at 5:54 am

    Wow! This is a great article and analysis. Thank you Shawn for doing the math and making the subject plain as day.

    Congratulations to Hugh Howey and his agent on a fantastic deal.

  16. Barbara Freethy on December 16, 2012 at 8:23 am

    Great article and analysis. When you mentioned you were astonished that there wasn’t more press on Hugh Howey’s deal, I was also surprised there wasn’t more press on Bella Andre’s 7 figure print only deal that happened several months ago. I’m thrilled for both of them and excited that at least two publishers have seen an opportunity to turn amazing digital sales into print. I hope it’s the wave of the future. There is still a print market for popular digital books but writers can’t afford to give e-rights away for print anymore, especially not for 25% of net.

  17. David Kaufmann on December 16, 2012 at 7:09 pm

    Shawn, you and Steven are a great team. An educational and inspirational article. With all the columns and blogs being written about the changing nature of publishing, few, if any, are written with the combination of skill and experience you bring to the table. Thanks.

  18. Kat Sanders on December 16, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    This is an amazing time to be a writer, publisher or artist. The ability to reach all corners of the world with just a computer and internet access is changing the way everyone is doing things. For writers this means publishing e-books are the priority rather than paper.

    I can’t remember the last time I bought a physical copy of a novel. The only physical copies of books I buy at this point is for crafts, where the pictures are just as important as the words on the page. That, too, is changing as technology is catching up.

    Thank you for an writing an awesome article showing us how to “follow the money”.

  19. JLOakley on December 16, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    Wow. A long and very detailed article, but well worth the time to lay out the figures for us. Very cool. I knew I made the right choice going with my first novel as both an ebook and soft cover.

  20. Pilar Arsenec on December 17, 2012 at 6:51 am

    Awesome article. Thank you.

  21. Brahm Memone on December 17, 2012 at 9:57 am

    Shawn, thank you you for being so insightful. It is certainly food for thought, to begin to understand the publishing world and the longtail business.

  22. Jeanne Cavelos on December 19, 2012 at 4:58 am

    Shawn! Great to hear from you! Wonderful article.


  23. Joe Curtis on December 20, 2012 at 4:04 am

    Excellent work Hugh – when you buying that yacht!

    It’s an excellent book and you deserve all of this success.

    Oh, and the $1,000 quote that Shawn has quoted for conversion of 50 Shades to Kindle, I’ll happily do that for much much less!! 😉

    Great article.

  24. A.Beth on January 7, 2013 at 12:28 pm

    One nit to pick: not all of those ebook sales would’ve been 70%, from Amazon. If you sell outside the Blessed Zones, you only get 35%. My own sales are probably 5-15% outside the Blessed Zones, which, while trivial with my own numbers, might alter the numbers for 50 Shades of Grey (or any other similar big hit) a bit more significantly. Or maybe not; after enough zeros get thrown around, my mind glazes over.

    (And even the 70% ones aren’t 70% — they’re 70% minus about 10 cents for transmission costs. That’s probably in the “noise” for Shades, but it’s something to keep in mind.)

  25. John Fanning on June 9, 2013 at 12:07 pm

    Dear Steven, Incisive article. Great to see the numbers and lucidity. Thank you. Gives me the impetus to set up our own publishing house because of my own unpublished novels as well as all the writers that come through our retreat here in France. One of those writers actually brought her favorite book – “Gates of Fire” – when she was here on her third retreat. As someone with a degree in Classics I was shocked at how wonderful your novel is. Well done! I look forward to reading “Turning Pro,” especially if it’s any way as insightful as “The War of Art.”

  26. mcm バックパック on August 6, 2013 at 11:38 pm

    louis vuitton 福岡

  27. Debbie L Kasman on January 1, 2016 at 8:26 am

    Shawn,thanks for being so honest with us. I’ve loved every single blog you have written but this one wins the prize. You are changing lives with every single keystroke you make. I’m so happy to know there are kind, honest, ethical and generous people in the world like you. Things may be a mess “out there” but when more and more people start to think like you, the world will be transformed forever. Thanks for leading the way. Happy new year!

    • Mary Doyle on January 1, 2016 at 2:26 pm

      Debbie, I couldn’t have said it better! I wasn’t following this blog the first time this was posted. Thanks for the rerun Shawn – this is a winner!

      Happy New Year to you and to everyone else who meets here every week! We are (happily) in your debt.

      • Shawn Coyne on January 4, 2016 at 7:18 am

        Debbie and Mary,
        Many many thanks for your kind words. Really appreciate your memberships in Steve, Callie and Jeff and my tribe. Glad to give whatever I have in my head away to those as fascinated by this world as I am.
        Happy New Year!

  28. Michael Beverly on January 2, 2016 at 1:37 pm

    So bottom line?

    If you think you have a winner: self publish?

    You can’t find out if a series is a success to be able to not sell it to a publisher if you’ve already sold it.

    • Shawn Coyne on January 4, 2016 at 7:27 am

      Hi Michael,

      My position on selling to a publisher is that if you need the dough to write the book, God bless that they are there. If they finance your work…then they deserve every penny they receive when it succeeds. Steve and I sell our stuff to the majors when we just can’t afford to write the book on our own dimes. Without the major publishers, great books would never be written. They are indispensable to the culture! I’m in no way knocking them.

      But if you’ve financed the work yourself, you should finance the publishing of it too. Publishers do not have any magic fairy dust to make a book an evergreen bestseller that sells year after year after year. The only thing that makes a backlist bestseller is the book itself and the moment in time that it is published. Plus passionate tribe members who spread the word. And patience.

      All the best,

      • Marvin Waschke on January 4, 2016 at 1:47 pm

        Shawn– I like what you say about traditional publishers. I see too much BS about their evil and greed. They are not angels and they are as short-sighted as any public corporation, but I think they have a role.

        In my case, I have a publisher who has given me advances and three rounds of editing on each of 3 books. I am just a novice author, so they are financing my education. The advances aren’t large, but I damn glad that they are investing in me.

        I wish you, Steve, and Callie a great New Year.

  29. Robin on January 3, 2016 at 11:56 am

    Very, very inspiring and informative. Thank you!!

  30. Emily Anderson on January 16, 2016 at 10:27 am

    So much good information here. It’s not easy, but I’ve always believed holding back the best part of yourself is what will ultimately sustain you. One thing to keep in mind is the opportunity cost–how much upside do you personally need, and how much hassle are you willing to deal with. The ultimate trick is to let go once you’ve made that decision, dig deep and be really clear about what you want, what your endgame is. A few years ago I decided I wasn’t going to write for free (“exposure”) anymore, (including my own blog) determining that I’d paid my dues, and I needed to capitalize on my experience. If I wasn’t getting paid, I was going to be at the playground with my kids. Well, I’ve spent a lot of time at the playground over the last five years, and I don’t regret a single moment of it. Now I’m getting back into marketing/content work, trying to figure out the new rules of the publishing game–blurb, anyone?–and I just happened upon this site. One post and I’m already hooked. Thank you so much!!!Emily

  31. Emily Anderson on January 16, 2016 at 10:31 am

    Once more thing I should mention–it just so happens Random House purchased distribution writes of my first book–Eco Chic Weddings–from the small publisher that first published it. It remains a bestseller in the wedding category, though it came out 10 years ago and is in need of a revised edition. This article definitely gave me great food for thought. Thanks again.

  32. Charles chir on May 28, 2018 at 4:08 am

    This article misses the point. E.L. James did not self publish her books. She had given the rights to Writers coffee house. and would have received royalties from them. Vintage was able to negotiate with the author and TheWritets Coffe Shop to gain the rights and distribute the books widely which was brilliant.
    The comparison of author earnings to royalties paid in the article is completely incorrect because the author did not self publish and would have been receiving royalties either way.

Leave a Comment